Optimization On Manufacturing And Assembly Of The Existing Outdoor Swing

Chen , Siew Teen (2011) Optimization On Manufacturing And Assembly Of The Existing Outdoor Swing. Project Report. UTeM, Melaka Malaysia. (Submitted)

	PDF (24 Pages) Optimization_On_Manufacturing_And_Assembly_Of_The_Existing_Outdoor_Swing-24_Pages.pdf - Submitted Version Download (194kB)
	PDF (Full Text) Optimization_On_Manufacturing_And_Assembly_Of_The_Existing_Outdoor_Swing-Full_Text_-_Copy.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)

Abstract

This project is purpose to create technical research for undergraduate students which have high potential in technical paper publication. The objective of the final project is to optimize in manufacture and assembly of the existing outdoor swing. Throughout this project, an existing swing will separated each part purpose to do analysis and to critique the assembly point of view. After done the analysis, by using the Boothroyd-Dewhurst method some of the part will eliminate or reduce and redesign remain part as possible and come out with the some conceptual design. To ensure the purpose is achieved, some of the important element must be consider, there are followed the scope of project such as, literature review of the DFMA. In this project, all the design drawing, drawn by using the Solidworks software. Finally, the new design will be compared with the original design from aspect, assembly cost, assembly time, part quantity and design efficiency. Base on calculation, the result had been containing for manual analysis, the percentage of design efficiency is 14 %, and for software analysis, the percentage of design efficiency is 35%. For percentage of part quantity, the result is 29% for both analyses. The result for percentage of assembly time is 52% for manual analysis and 99% for software analysis. Mean while the percentage of assembly cost is 97% for manual analysis and 100% for software analysis. From the overall result, the result obtained in software and manual analysis was not much different. For example, in result of design efficiency, the different values in manual result and software result for concept swing design was not much different. For manual existing design efficiency the result is 28% and for software the result is 26%.

Actions (login required)

View Item